Need all Congresses? Press Enter for expanded results.

SB 645

California - Session 2025-2026

Senate enacted 2025-10-11
Bill Details

Title: Juries: peremptory challenges.

Summary

Existing law provides for the exclusion of a prospective juror from a trial jury by peremptory challenge. Existing law prohibits a party from using a peremptory challenge to remove a prospective juror on the basis of, among other things, the prospective juror’s race, ethnicity, or gender. Existing law allows a party, or the trial court on its own motion, to object to the use of a peremptory challenge based on these criteria. Upon objection, existing law requires the party exercising the challenge to state the reasons the peremptory challenge has been exercised. Existing law requires the court to evaluate the reasons given, as specified, and, if the court grants the objection, authorizes the court to take certain actions, including, but not limited to, starting a new jury selection, declaring a mistrial at the request of the objecting party, seating the challenged juror, or providing another remedy as the court deems appropriate. Under existing law, one of the circumstances the court may consider includes whether the counsel or counsel’s office exercising the challenge has used peremptory challenges disproportionately against a given race, ethnicity, gender, gender identity, sexual orientation, national origin, or religious affiliation, or perceived membership in any of these groups, in the present case or in past cases, as specified. Existing law, until January 1, 2026, prohibits the application of these provisions to civil cases. This bill would extend the prohibition against application of these provisions to civil cases indefinitely, except as specified, including cases involving a civil rights violation and cases for the civil commitment of a person. The bill would require the party bringing specified claims to notify the court and the other party or parties of the applicability of these provisions in those civil cases, as specified. The bill would limit the court’s consideration of counsel or counsel’s office use of peremptory challenges in the present case or in past cases, as described above, to when counsel or counsel’s office is a public entity.

Sponsor
Umberg
Official Source Back to Bills
Support LegiList

Tracking state legislation? Support LegiList with a small contribution. Independent, ad-free, and built by one developer.

Payments are processed securely by Stripe in a separate window. LegiList never stores card details.
Actions Timeline
Date Event Detail
2025-02-20 Introduced Bill introduced
2025-10-11 Status enacted
2025-10-11 Latest Action Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 656, Statutes of 2025.
More Bills In Similar Categories
Bill Title Status
AB 2064 Discrimination: formerly incarcerated status. in_committee
AB 1538 Crimes: corruption. in_committee
AB 1545 Sexually violent predators. in_committee
AB 1535 Hate crimes: political affiliation. in_committee
AB 2190 Internet website accessibility. in_committee
AB 2347 Commission on Peace Officer Standards and Training: hate crime training and guidelines. in_committee
SB 1114 Data collection: sexual orientation, gender identity, and intersex status: disclosure. in_committee
SB 1328 Public postsecondary education: Equity in Higher Education Act: campus contact. in_committee